Group Forums >> MAKERS OF CREATIVE IDEAS IN HR >> HR Practices in Recruitment
HR Practices in Recruitment
| back to top |
Posted 5 months ago now a days every company hr is following the same principles and ideas to recruit an prospective candidate.So what do you people think to bring any change in hiring a candidate.So is there anyone who think they have best points to be included in recruitment? |
| back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I am not agree with you thought. If may look same from board perspective if you look in-details, everybody are not following the same. |
| back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago In todays global village it is very difficult to find out the appropriate candidate .Company's trying hard to recruit experience skilled labor by paying high packages.When recruiting people think that it is very easy that experince people manage the things better. But in my view this wrong perception perceived by the recruiters .Freshers they have zeal to work , update thier knowledge , strive for career growth, easily can be motivated .They need only industry training .With training only we can incorporate skills in the employee and we can cut cost by paying very high packages to the employees .
|
| back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago During interviews, make sure that the interviewees don't give 'stock answers' to the questions. It's important that the responses are unique, and haven't just been memorized from a 'how-to' interview manual. |
| back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago When I interview people I am a firm believer that a person's questions to the interviewer are just as important, if not more so, than the person giving the interview. Never just ask stock questions about company culture and work hours. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago I agree that the questions you ask the interviewer are extremely important. Interviews are like any human relationship - it is a two-way process. The interviewee should be selective about the kinds of questions they ask. They should not be pre-programmed as something you can pull out of their annual report. Something like hours of work, though, on the surface may seem like a stock question but could have interesting responses should you enquire about the availability of flexible schedules such as telework and compressed work schedules. It may help the interviewee feel that the organization shows innovation and value toward its employees. That is a bonus. Thanks for letting me share. I am not a member of this group but your topic really interested me. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago I think recruiting can be done at any aspect. I concentrate at all stores and places that I am the customer at. If I notice that the person is being attentive to the customer, high in energy, able to multi-task, and other qualities I look for, then I start recruiting. I think that observing someone that is currently employed in their profession can trigger recruiting instantly if a desired candidate. As far as the interviewing process, I firmly believe in the behavioral interview process. When conducted effectively, unique situations from the candidate's experience can be retrieved. This will allow the interviewer to identify specific qualities that tie into the company's core vision and values. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago I concur with rkelleh, behavioral questions are a fantastic approach to identify a good prospect. One strategy for preparing for behavioral interviews is to use the STAR Technique, as outlined below. (This technique is often referred to as the SAR and PAR techniques as well.) Situation or Task - Describe the situation that you were in or the task that you needed to accomplish. You must describe a specific event or situation, not a generalized description of what you have done in the past. Be sure to give enough detail for the interviewer to understand. This situation can be from a previous job, from a volunteer experience, or any relevant event. Action you took - Describe the action you took and be sure to keep the focus on you. Even if you are discussing a group project or effort, describe what you did not the efforts of the team. Don't tell what you might do, tell what you did. Results you achieved - What happened? How did the event end? What did you accomplish? What did you learn? |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago I think problem the world over is giving freshers a chance. globally we intend to follow the same practise neglecting our diverse orientations...hi time we started practising recruitment considering our local environment and orientations.freshers would need to start somewhere in order to save every proffession! |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago This is just a general comment. Recruiters as well as numerous professionals in other functional disciplines can become stale on the job. To clarify, sometimes the longer a person has been on the job, the tasks and assignments that that person performs become mundane, routine and they are no longer challenged by their daily work. While this situation most certainly does not pertain to everyone, it does happen quite frequently. Sometimes the fresh approach is to change the person's duties from time to time and or bring someone else in who has a different perspective or approach. Many times people who are hired in new positions have more vigor and energy than perhaps a person who has been on the job for 30 years. It's human nature that when given a new challenge, a new job, that a person's drive and energy level will increase because they want to prove their worth to the company and co-workers. I am not saying that the person should be displaced or let go, but perhaps a break from their normal routine and given other assignments will rejuvenate them and allow them to continue to contribute at the level that is most beneficial to the company and to the person. Sometimes a simple job change or transfer of duties improves the process. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago I am a supporter of behavioral interviewing and, thankfully, so is my company. We believe that past behavior is the best predictor of future performance. Behavioral interviewing is not new but the style is effective in hiring the best candidates IF correctly applied. Managers and interviewers must be trained well to ask appropriate questions and use appropriate verbage. The interview should be a reflection of the company's goals, mission, and values. By this I mean that the time between recruitment and hire should seem like a well flowing process and a good introduction to the company. Applicants should be given a REALISTIC job preview. It makes no sense to bring someone all the way through the interview process to hire without giving them a good idea about both the job and the environment. I find myself in a dilemma sometimes, especially when recruiting for managers in a problem area, because I don't want to scare them away but I don't want to mislead them, either. Additionally, as recruitment grows and our methods become more electronic and less personal, its important to recognize that the applicant is still a person and should walk away with the feeling that they are important to your company, if not for this position perhaps for another. Recruitment isn't only concerned with the position that you're interviewing for at present but also planting a seed with a candidate for a future position. If you make a bad impression during the interview process with a likely candidate for another position in the future, it's like advertising that you only care about them when they are "valuable" to you. Recruting candidates takes a lot of creativity, especially in competitive environments. However, if the lights and glam don't match the show, the applicants will be leaving as quickly as they came. Recruitment is a critical area in HR and should be included in helping to drive the company's image. Recruiters should play a more active role in retention beginning BEFORE trying to attract candidates. The culture of a company should be used as a template for the recruiting plan so that when candidates become employees, the actuality matches the hype they experienced beforehand. Recruitment should not end when the candidate is hired. Recruitment should continue through a transitional period until it becomes retention efforts but should be designed in such a way that the employee doesn't know that they are being "re-recruited." This is NOT an overnight process because it involves preparing current employees for a change and getting their buy in. Without the buy in of current employees, no amount of retention efforts would be successful. |
|
back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago I actually saw some really great questions yesterday. It was a series of fourteen questions, and you were given four choices to give as your answer to each question. These questions were about how you would handle situations that you would come across in a high-pressure office that dealt with people who were going to be in a panic when they came to you....working for the Ministry of Justice. At first, I thought all of the questions were really great. Then, a further reading of what was going on made them better. You didn't just get to tick which one you thought was the best answer. You had to rank each choice from 1 to 4. This gave the employer a little insight into the personality of how you would approach situations. You had to think of how you would rate each answer, which meant that you were no longer able to give pat answers. I must say, I really thought that was a great piece of interviewing! |
